In our comprehensive paper ‘Inflation Hedging in Strategic Asset Allocations: Gold or Something Else?’ we provide evidence to suggest that gold may not be a reliable inflation hedge.
It is important to note that the great inflation of the 1970s was immediately preceded by the final abandonment of the gold standard on August 15, 1971, when Richard Nixon announced that the United States would no longer redeem currency for gold. Prior to this announcement, the US dollar price of gold was fixed, and many other countries pegged their exchange rate in terms of dollars. In fact, the dollar price of gold was being held artificially low by the guarantee of explicit convertibility into US dollars at a fixed rate. The figure below shows that gold on deposit at the Federal Reserve to support convertibility plummeted between 1949 and 1970, and when it became clear that convertibility could not be sustained indefinitely, the peg was abandoned, and the price of gold subsequently rose relative to all major currencies.
Monetary Gold Stock for the United States
Source: National Bureau of Economic Research, accessed via FRED on 10/1/21.
Over the following decade, gold prices rallied dramatically relative to the US dollar. In other words, US dollars and the currencies of other Bretton Woods nations lost purchasing power dramatically relative to gold. It is not surprising, then, to learn that the price inflation of goods was high during this period, as the value of fiat currencies fell to adjust for the abandonment of convertibility to gold.
Statistically, we find that gold prices and inflation were correlated at +0.341 between 1967 and 1980. Interestingly, gold had a large negative correlation of -0.512 with the US Dollar Index as well, while the US Dollar Index and inflation were totally uncorrelated.
Studying only the period after 1980, the relationship between gold and inflation disappears totally and the correlation measures -0.07.3 There is no discernible relationship. But the relationship between gold and the US Dollar Index remains and has a similar magnitude of -0.434 relative to the earlier period. Thirdly, inflation and the value of the US dollar were statistically unrelated.
We interpret this fact pattern to mean that, in general, gold is a pure play short the US dollar. In the 1970s, currency depreciation resulting from the abandonment of the gold standard was a significant driver of the inflation in the Consumer Price Index. In addition, the US Dollar Index is the price of the US dollar relative to a basket of other developed currencies. Because many developed currencies had also been de facto pegged to gold through their peg to the US dollar, it is not surprising that a portion of the inflation should appear to be totally unrelated to the price of the basket of currencies.
Given the proximity of outstanding gold performance to the end of US dollar convertibility to gold, we think it likely that the price of gold had been held artificially low for an extended period (or the price of US dollars was held artificially high) and that the subsequent abandonment of convertibility drove an adjustment period both in consumer prices and in the price of gold relative to the US dollar. In other words, abandoning the gold standard was in part causative of inflation and of the increase in gold prices. The great increase in gold prices in the 1970s was not some endogenous macroeconomic response to inflation—it was the direct result of the same event that drove a portion of the inflation. In the absence of a gold standard, the adjustments in consumer prices and in gold would probably have taken place over a longer period and in a less disruptive way—the gold standard acted as a dam holding back natural economic forces. But as pressure mounted, the dam eventually broke (the US ran out of gold with which to support convertibility), leading to a much more disruptive adjustment.
The figure below shows the value of US dollars relative to gold starting at the point when the gold standard was discontinued in August 1971. Alongside this, we show the value of various foreign currencies after their pegs against the US dollar were abandoned. The point is that the pace and magnitude of US dollar devaluation is typical of a broken currency peg. Pegs break because natural economic forces push on them. In the case of the gold standard, it was lack of availability of gold with which to support convertibility. When currency pegs break, it is because of a shortage of the reference currency with which to defend the peg. During initial defense of the peg, the economic forces build such that when the peg eventually breaks, the moves are very substantial. We believe that the end of the gold standard was the primary driver of strong gold performance in the 1970s, and that the inflation hedging benefits of gold in the 1970s were essentially coincidental. Certainly, the conditions for a repeat of this performance are not in place today.
Typical Behavior of a Broken Peg: US Dollar Relative to Gold after the End of the Gold Standard
Source: Bloomberg, accessed on 10/1/21.
Want to know more?
Provide your details and we will send you the full article:
Your personal information will be collected by Newton Investment Management and Newton Investment Management North America, (collectively referred to as ’Newton Group’) and will be used to respond to your query. Your personal information will be shared within the BNY Mellon group of companies as far as it is necessary to respond to your query. Your personal information will not be shared with external third parties. Newton Group will transfer or store your personal information in other countries, including those outside Europe, under the protection of appropriate safeguards. For more information about how we collect, use and share personal information and your legal rights please contact us at Data.Privacy@newtonim.com or see BNY Mellon’s full privacy notice. You may unsubscribe at any time.
1,2,3,4 Source: Bloomberg, accessed 10/1/21, and Newton calculations.
Authors
Newton multi-asset solutions team
Insights from the Newton multi-asset solutions team
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. Any reference to a specific security, country or sector should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell this security, country or sector. Please note that strategy holdings and positioning are subject to change without notice. For additional Important Information, click on the link below.
Important information
For Institutional Clients Only. Issued by Newton Investment Management North America LLC ("NIMNA" or the "Firm"). NIMNA is a registered investment adviser with the US Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation ("BNY Mellon"). The Firm was established in 2021, comprised of equity and multi-asset teams from an affiliate, Mellon Investments Corporation. The Firm is part of the group of affiliated companies that individually or collectively provide investment advisory services under the brand "Newton" or "Newton Investment Management". Newton currently includes NIMNA and Newton Investment Management Ltd ("NIM") and Newton Investment Management Japan Limited ("NIMJ").
Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed.
Statements are current as of the date of the material only. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, which change over time. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment and past performance is no indication of future performance.
Information about the indices shown here is provided to allow for comparison of the performance of the strategy to that of certain well-known and widely recognized indices. There is no representation that such index is an appropriate benchmark for such comparison.
This material (or any portion thereof) may not be copied or distributed without Newton’s prior written approval.
In Canada, NIMNA is availing itself of the International Adviser Exemption (IAE) in the following Provinces: Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba and Ontario and the foreign commodity trading advisor exemption in Ontario. The IAE is in compliance with National Instrument 31-103, Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations.
